Over at the the Huffington Post they are trying to paint the GOP House leader as a bigot for following his oath of office, while playing the President as their knight in shining armor, even though the president will not clarify his position on gay marriage (in the past Mr. Obama has stated that he does not support gay marriage, then he did,). From the Huffington Post (Link)
"That's why I was shocked to hear that Speaker John Boehner decided to use our tax dollars to intervene and stand up for DOMA to deny LGBT Americans the rights they deserve. This is discrimination -- plain and simple."You were shocked! I was shocked that the Obama government used our tax dollars to sue our states for doing the job Mr. Obama won't do.
While there are many rights that individual Americans have, there are only a few "rights" that are protected by the rule of law. If you study the US Constitution, and including the Bill of Rights along with the rest of the amendments, you will be unable to find marriage mentioned at all. There is a reason for this. Many natural and "implied" rights cannot and should not involve government's heavy hand to interfere with individual adult choices. And there is a reason for this. We need only look at the state of the economy to know how well government meddling works.
Our government was founded around a mostly 'hands off' philosophy (where individuals are concerned) unless one infringes on the "protected rights" of others. And now, some are begging government to be the decider of who can marry whom. It boggles the mind.
But as much as some people wish that their particular issue was protected by law, the plain fact is many are not.
But married people have no more actual "protected rights" than anyone else. That is why I believe using the word "rights" when discussing gay marriage is more of a propaganda tool than an actual "right" that should be protected by law. Those special treatments that a married couple enjoy are the result of centuries marital disputes and contract law where the aggrieved parties seek a resolution through the government. Politicians pandering to a large voting block have enacted many marriage friendly laws. But today, we are much more enlightened about different lifestyles and can offer the same laws covering property and other issues that arise to cover gay and lesbian couples that would be unheard of in decades past.
If you want a "right" to gay marriage, I recommend a Constitutional amendment to add the right. It would then be protected by government.